Certain software tools can help authors of online magazines to check for the originality of articles and reviews, and in this capacity applications such as Copyscape are most suitable. They allow an publisher to ascertain if the article you are using has been copied or not necessarily and if so to what extent. The tools are wonderful with this.
To get academic writing, especially dissertations and PhD theses, you require a human proofreader-editor to check work rather than a software tool. If you have a friend whose written English surpasses yours, then ask them to went through your work and make the info changes to grammar together with spelling. You have to have consistent punctuational, either US or United kingdom English except for quotations since you cannot change the punctuational in these.
It’s fine to use formatting applications and spell checks, although if you are writing academic British, it is likely that a grammar checking tool will not know how to overcome such writing, as it is simply not natural language or at the least not the natural words the software tool has been produced to accept as correct.
If you think your family members are not proficient enough to help tackle your writing, then you definitely should consider using the services with professional academic proofreaders and editors. Proofreaders check for problems, and may not comment on a person who of your work. They may not just comment on the amount of padding its content has. That being so you may want to hire the services on the proofreader-editor who will comment on superfluous pieces of text and give recommendations as to how your work is usually improved.
Paraphrasing tools are also good if you are a creative writer jammed for a synonym, but are certainly not so good if you want to change a substantial body of text in addition to want a tool to paraphrase it. The end results are usually non-sensical to readers. Writers which do this kind of thing may have an original text, but nobody wants to read it.
Of course it is best not to plagiarize, but sometimes this is done inadvertently, as there is nothing more standard than paraphrasing. Citing some sort of author and giving credit ratings for his/her work has to be done as a matter naturally. A good proofreader editor is much better than a software tool for tidying up and preparing a written work before it’s submitted.
You can ask the editor to simply change what is necessary or look for comments only. A good publisher will be knowledgeable about the arena you are writing in but will also be able to check for plagiarism as sometimes it is obvious on the trained eye, as the prepared language changes when you use someone else’s words. A software tool could possibly not be able to pick up on these kinds of changes to your written style.
Mention This Site: http://socs.civicus.org/?p=5275